As always, here’s my fairly literal translation of these
verses:
13Then
Nebuchadnezzar in shaking anger and hot wrath said to bring Shadrach, Meshach,
and Abednego. Then the men those were brought before the king. 14Nebuchadnezzar
answering and saying to them, “[Is it] true, Shadrach, Meshach, Abednego, my
gods you are not serving and the image of the gold which I set up not
worshipping? 15Now if you are ready in the time which you hear the
sound of the horn, the pipe, zither, the lyre, harp, and pipes, and the all of
the kinds of music you fall and you worship the image I made and if not you will
worship in that moment, you will be cast to the midst of the furnace of the
fire burning, and who [is] that god who will deliver you from my hand?” 16Shadrach,
Meshach, and Abednego answered and saying to the king Nebuchadnezzar, “We
not having need upon this matter to respond. 17If it is [so], our
God whom we worshipping being able to deliver us from the furnace of the
fire burning and from your hand, O king, He may deliver [us].18And
if not being delivered, let it be [known] to you O king that your gods we are
not serving and the image of the gold which you set up we will not worship.”
Once again, there is so much to write on these verses, I
almost don’t know where to start. What we have before us, of course, is one of
the classic cases where believers are faced with earthly commands with which
they simply cannot comply.
Right off the bat, I want to acknowledge that this is
particularly difficult for real believers precisely because we are compliant
people. James says the wisdom that is from above is “first of all pure, then
peace-loving, considerate, submissive …” (3:17). Paul tells us in Galatians, “The
fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness,
faithfulness, meekness …” (5:22,23). Believers in the work place are to be “subject
to their bosses in everything, to try to please them, not to talk back to them …”
(Titus 2:9,10). I could multiply passages like these from cover to cover in the
Bible. As believers, a huge part of our spiritual growth is learning not
to be rebellious, not to be headstrong, not to be self-assertive. We learn to
work with sweet spirits, to try hard to get along with everyone, and in
particular to please our bosses and those over us. Our gentle submissiveness is
and ought to be one of the qualities that most endear us to those around us. We
simply learn to be naturally compliant people – and we should.
But then that makes it particularly difficult for us when we
come to those times where we have to stand our ground and say, “No.” I particularly feel their pain when these guys
have to actually stand in front of Nebuchadnezzar and displease him to his
face. As real believers I have no doubt they have by this time distinguished
themselves to Nebuchadnezzar precisely because they serve him so well. I do not
doubt they have established a relationship with this monarch where he
particularly finds these guys easy to manage. Someone could interpret it
differently, but I think the text itself supports the fact that, going into
this confrontation, Nebuchadnezzar actually likes
these guys. Back in chapter 1, we were told he found “none equal” to them and
Daniel. It says, “In every matter of wisdom and understanding about which the
king questioned them, he found them ten times better than all the magicians and
enchanters in his whole kingdom” (1:19,20). Of course, in chapter 2, Daniel
interpreted the king’s dream for him when no one else could.
Notice too in this text that the Chaldeans had leveled
three accusations against the guys: 1. They pay no attention to you, 2. They do
not serve your gods, and 3. They do not worship the image of gold which you
have set up” (v12). When Nebuchadnezzar asks them, “Is it true?” he only
mentions 2. and 3. I don’t think that is an irrelevant deletion. He already
knows it is not true, “They pay no
attention to you.” Notice too that even though he is very angry, even the very discussion
he is having with them is about giving them a
second chance. His decree was that, if anyone did not fall down and
worship, in that moment, they would
be cast into the fiery furnace. Here he is willing to do a complete replay of
the entire procession, just to give these guys another chance. Personally, I
don’t think he wants to throw them in
the fiery furnace. These are three of his best people. He’s used to liking them. He’s used to them being
unusually compliant and easy to supervise. Notice too that, after they make it
clear they will not comply, it very specifically says in v.19, “his attitude
toward them changed.”
I say all of this continuing to acknowledge how hard this is
for these guys. They have established an excellent relationship with this king
precisely because they are compliant and happily do whatever he requires of
them, then they suddenly find themselves standing before him knowing they are
displeasing him. It is easy to focus on how they need to obey God and not men,
and they do, but let’s not lose sight of the fact that resistance and
non-compliance are just plain “out of character” for these guys, as they are
for all real believers.
Unfortunately, there are simply innumerable situations we
face like this, where we have to displease people while we are normally known
to be compliant and “easy to get along with.” It is precisely these times we
are reminded why we’re compliant. It
actually isn’t ultimately to please our bosses and the people around us. We’re
compliant with them precisely because we’re compliant with our Lord. As in Col
3:23,24: “And whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for
the Lord, not for men … It is the Lord Christ you are serving.”
Hopefully for us Christians, our humble spirits, our
compliant, easy-to-get-along with manner is actually an expression of our
constant, personal relationship with the Lord – so that when we have to choose
between pleasing God or pleasing people, that decision will already be made.
I also want to record a few more thoughts based on what the
guys said. I think there is an element of modern Christianity that would want
to assume that they were “militant,” that somehow that’s how we’re supposed to
be when we do face these situations. Once again, I realize it is all subject to
other interpretation, but I don’t think they were “militant” at all. I think
they went on being the same humble young men. Notice that their response was
short. They could have gone into a long dissertation on their belief in one God
as opposed to everyone else’s polytheism. But they didn’t. They specifically
said, “We have no need to respond to this matter.” I think what they meant was
there was no need to even take up the king’s time discussing it all. They
realized at this point he must carry
out the threatened punishment. The herald’s warning was crystal clear – bow or
burn. They won’t bow. They must burn. To
do less would undermine the king’s authority.
Notice too that they (at least twice) refer to him as “O
king.” They are acknowledging his position of authority.
Also, I think they respectfully answer his question, “What
god shall deliver you out of my hand?” They could have gone on quite a
dissertation on the power of God. They could have even told the king the
stories of Pharaoh (“Who is the Lord, that I should serve Him?” and Sennacherib
(“Do not let the god you depend on deceive you …”) and what happened to them. Instead,
they simply assert that they do believe their God is able to deliver them, but
then say, “But even if not, we’ll still obey Him.” Finally they state their
position very clearly, “We will not serve your gods or worship the idol.” Once again,
I don’t think we should read in any “militance” (which frankly just comes
across as obstinance). I think they are just very bravely making sure there is
no question whatsoever where they stand. That can be expressed humbly but
clearly, which is what I think they’re doing.
We will in many ways face exactly this situation. Living our
faith, there will be times when we have to stand our ground. Jesus warned us
about it. Paul said, “All who live godly in Christ Jesus will face persecution.”
Maybe there will be times where we too have to engage in “civil disobedience.”
But I rather think most of the time it is the little decisions of day to day,
like when men want to bash on their wives or wives their husbands, or when
people at work are bashing on the boss or on the co-workers, and they want us
to join in. It might be the less than scrupulous business practices.
Whatever it is, I hope we believers will go into it already
having established our relationships as people who are humble and submissive.
And then, however we need to respond, may we do it in that same humble,
submissive spirit as we have to make it clear we cannot and will not go along.
No comments:
Post a Comment