21Tell me, ones desiring to be under law, do you not hear
the law? 22For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the
slave woman and one by the free woman. 23But, on the one hand, the one
out of the slave woman was born according to flesh, [while] on the other hand,
the one out of the free woman [was born] through promise.
24These are an allegory, for they are two covenants. On the
one hand, one [is] from Mt. Sinai giving birth into slavery, which is Hagar, 25and
this Hagar is Mt. Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for
she is in slavery with her children. 26On the other hand, the above
Jerusalem, which is [the] mother of us,
is free, 27for it is written,
“Rejoice, O barren one, the one not having
children, the one not giving birth, break forth and exclaim, because many are
the children of the desolate one rather than the one having the husband.”
28And we, brethren,
are children of promise, according to Isaac, 29but just as the one
born according to flesh was then persecuting the one [born] according to
spirit, thus also now. 30But what does the Scripture say?
“Cast out the slave woman and the son of
hers, for the son of the slave woman will never inherit with the son of the
free woman”.
31Wherefore,
brethren, we are not children of slavery but of the free woman. 5:1Christ
freed us to the freedom, therefore be standing firm and do not be being bound
again to a yoke of slavery.
I’m really glad I finally got a chance to actually study
this passage. I have of course read it over and over through the years, but I
would have to say I’ve always found it a little intimidating. Paul clearly and
specifically identifies the Sarah/Hagar account as an allegory and, if I may
add, a rather detailed one at that. It leaves one wondering, “Where are all the
other ‘allegories’ in the Bible?” Does this mean we should go back through the
OT and look for an allegory in every story that’s told? Who did Shadrach,
Meshach, and Abednego really represent and what was the significance that David
selected five smooth stones and on and on, ad nauseum. I think that unanswered
question is what always left me feeling a little intimidated by the passage.
What to make of this? Of course the blanket explanation of
it all is that Paul is writing under inspiration. If the Holy Spirit intended
Sarah and Hagar’s experience as an allegory, He is certainly free to explain it
to us through Paul. Since I don’t write under inspiration, I must limit my understanding
of the Bible to what is clearly presented. In this case, we are told that it
was an allegory. When it comes to Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, I may find
interesting parallels, but I could never say with authority, “This is an
allegory, and Shadrach stands for this, etc.”
I would suggest it to be spiritually presumptuous to take
this one passage and, based on it, to run through the Bible declaring
allegories wherever my supposedly sanctified imagination found them. Apparently
that has been a problem down through the centuries. Luther said, “[Allegories]
are dangerous things. Unless a person has a thorough knowledge of Christian
doctrine he had better leave allegories alone.”
Then I like what Luther went on to say, “Allegories are not
very convincing, but like pictures they visualize a matter … Having first
fortified his case with invincible arguments, [Paul] can afford to inject the
allegory to add impressiveness and beauty to his presentation.”
“Allegories are not very convincing.” I think Luther is
right and herein would be some wisdom, I think. It would be far better for us
to study the Bible to mine the clear truth it presents, than to spend our time
looking for allegories. As Luther says, “They are not very convincing anyway.”
I certainly would never change my life for some “truth” I imagined I found in
an allegory. The allegory can only, as in Paul’s case, illustrate truth already
presented “with invincible arguments.” Only rightly divided truth bears on my heart and makes me
different.
I think this is something entirely different than looking
for allegories, trying to find “secret” truths, which will only prove to the
rest of the world how smart I am …and do nothing to make me a sweeter, more
humble, Christ-like person.
So if the Holy Spirit, in Scripture, declares something to
be an allegory, wonderful. So it is. Beyond that, I should spend my time mining
for the clearly presented truth. Then when I see the lives of the people of the
Bible illustrating that truth, I should take heed to their example. But beyond
that, I officially accept that it is the truth that matters and not my
imaginations.
The other thing that I find interesting is Paul’s
observation, “… just as the one born
according to flesh was then persecuting the one [born] according to spirit,
thus also now.” I suppose it is a maxim of note that the Law will always
persecute the Spirit. I actually don’t mean that exactly but you get my drift –
those who are of the law, legalists, will always persecute those who enjoy the
freedom of real Holy Spirit-filled life. Even in the secular world, the people
who guard “the rules,” cannot bear people who actually live for the goals.
People are forever making up rules to “help” the rest of us accomplish our
goals. But having done so, they immediately lose all ability to see the goals
and care only for their rules. I realized some time ago that even at work goals
are far more important than rules and that sometimes you actually have to break
the rules to accomplish the goals. But what I also realized is that doing so
exposes you to the wrath of the rule-keepers who usually have the authority to
punish you in one way or another when you do break their rules. Never mind that
what you did actually accomplished the goal. As my old boss often said, “No
good turn goes unpunished.” Jesus’ most bitter enemies were not the Romans but
rather the “religious” Jews. Through the book of Acts there are only a couple
of instances where the Apostles got in trouble with the secular people. It was
almost always the “religious” Jews who opposed them or stirred up the secular
people to oppose them. The whole matter is somewhat of a paradox to me right
now but it is interesting to note Paul’s “even so now.”
Finally, I love the opening verse of chapter 5: “It is for
freedom Christ has set us free.” Reminds me of “And when you know the truth,
the truth shall set you free,” and “And if the Son shall set you free, you
shall be free indeed!” Interestingly, this morning I laid down this study,
headed to church and our pastor’s message was “beware of false freedom.” His point
was solidly out of Gen 3 and supported by the passage from II Peter 2:19, “While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of
corruption.” I suppose it would be worth an entire post just to
distinguish between the freedom Christ gives and the false “freedom” that sin
allures people with. Don’t know if I’ll wade into that but I certainly enjoy
the real freedom I have in Christ. It is a freedom even to study a passage like
Galatians 4:21-5:1 knowing when I’m done I’ll be glad I did … and I am!
No comments:
Post a Comment