Romans 2:25-29 “Unseen”

As always, here’s my fairly literal translation of these verses:

²⁵For, on the one hand, circumcision is being profitable if you should be practicing law, but if you should be being a transgressor of law, the circumcision of you has become uncircumcision. ²⁶Therefore, if the uncircumcised one is observing the righteousnesses of the Law, will not the uncircumcision of him be reckoned into circumcision? ²⁷And the one uncircumcised out of nature fulfilling the Law will judge you, the transgressor of law through [the] letter [of the Law] and circumcision. ²⁸For one is not a Jew in the appearance, neither [is] the circumcision in the appearance in flesh, ²⁹but the one in the secret [is] a Jew and circumcision [is] of heart in spirit not letter, the praise of whom [is] not out of men but out of God. 

Here is an interesting little quote from the book The Little Prince, p.97, by Saint-Exupery:

“‘Goodbye,’ said the fox. ‘And now here is my secret, a very simple secret: It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.’

‘What is essential is invisible to the eye,’ the little prince repeated, so that he would be sure to remember.” (The Little Prince, p.97, Saint-Exupery).

What Paul is doing here in Romans 2 is dismantling the defenses of the self-righteous Jews of his day. They were the “religious,” yet such people were the religious lost. As in every generation, they had fallen prey to the delusion that their outward practices of religion were their salvation. In this chapter, he’s already demonstrated their knowledge of the Law not only does not save them but rather only intensifies their condemnation – since they violate the very Law they pride themselves in knowing!

In verses 25-27, he tackles their final line of defense – their circumcision. They might have grudgingly admitted to Paul’s every assault up to this point, but their final defense would be, “Yes, but we’re circumcised.” When all else failed, they were quite confident that being circumcised Jews assured their final salvation. In these verses, what he shows is that the outward, physical act of circumcision in the end means nothing if a person doesn’t go on to actually keep the Law.

As the old writers used to point out, you could replace the word “circumcision” with “baptism” or “church membership” or “serving the Lord” and the exact same truths would apply to us in the church today. We too fall prey to the delusion that our outward practices of religion are our salvation, that those things are certain proofs of our being “right” with the Lord.

But verses 28 and 29 establish a truth which underlies every possible aspect of “religion,” and that is, just as the fox told the little prince, “What is essential is invisible to the eye.” Jesus made this very clear to the woman at the well: “God is spirit, and His worshipers must worship Him in spirit and in truth” (John 4:24). No wonder the Lord repeatedly told the Jewish people to “circumcise your hearts” (Deut 30:6; Jer. 4:4; etc.).

“God is spirit.” No wonder our outward acts and ceremonies mean nothing to Him unless they come from our hearts. Could we all agree that any religious “act,” no matter how apparently commendable, is in reality worthless if the person’s heart isn’t in it? Isn’t that something we can all see? How then do we deceive ourselves into believing that mere, outward acts are somehow in and of themselves significant. Then, how can we possibly deceive ourselves into believing they matter to God???

Real Christianity and salvation itself is first and foremost a matter of the heart. It has to be because we’re dealing with God! From beginning to end, nothing we might do and consider “religious” is of any value whatsoever if it isn’t done deliberately in the presence of God! Someone has pointed out that there is not a single “outward” act considered important to Christianity which an unregenerate person could not do. They can pray the right prayers, give testimonies that say all the right things, be baptized, join churches, teach Sunday School, even be pastors and missionaries – and all the while have no real relationship with God through Christ. The one thing they lack? Heart.

What they lack is the one thing which is “essential” – a real heart relationship with God – the one thing that is “invisible to the eye.”

This whole matter leads me to two conclusions that to me are profound.

The first is the realization of this fact, that “what is essential is invisible to the eye.” I’ve never really thought about how true it is that all that really matters is what we can’t see. In Hebrews 11:3, we learn, “By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God’s command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible.” The very “stuff” our universe is made of (including us!) is actually invisible! Hebrews 11 goes on to say in verse 6, “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” I think too of I Peter 3:4, “Instead, it should that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God’s sight.” And, once again, we’re reminded, what are the two great commands? “Love God and love people.” “On these two commands hang all the Law and the prophets.” In Galatians 5:6, Paul asserts, “The only thing that counts is faith expressing itself through love.”

God is spirit. In this world, spirit is unseen, yet that is what God is and He’s the most important of everything! What is seen can only possibly matter if somehow it is reflecting the reality of spirit things. No wonder we must worship Him in spirit and in truth.

The second thing I see from this is the profound importance of learning to distinguish between spirit obedience and mere legal obedience. Verse 29 refers to this as “the spirit” versus, “the letter.” One could write an entire book on the subject (God already did!), but one must understand the difference. I don’t know that I’ve ever seen this so clearly. Legal obedience is simply “keeping the rules.” For instance, the Bible says, “Thou shalt not commit adultery,” so I shouldn’t cheat on my wife, right? Well, if we obey God for no other reason than such legal obedience, we’ll certainly be better off than not obeying Him at all. The man who is faithful to his wife will certainly save himself from a host of horrors. Well enough. But “they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth.”

“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.” And it is. But it is only the beginning. And what is the end of wisdom? “To love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.” It isn’t about simply “keeping the rules.” Legal obedience may have its place, but the Lord wants something far more. “My son, give Me thine heart.” We’re back to the heart. And how does that relate to “Thou shalt not commit adultery?”

It goes something like this: Here I am enjoying this marvelous relationship with this God who loves me. I know what a failure I am and yet here He is blessing me and protecting me, giving me strength for every day. I so enjoy His ever-present love. Then I look to my wife and sincerely wish to show her that same love. I know God loves her just like He loves me. I want her to know His love but I want to be an expression of that love. I want to be to her His hands and feet and voice. And what was that someone was saying about adultery? What? That isn’t even on the radar screen.

That’s spirit obedience. It’s not just “keeping the rules.” It’s living a relationship with the God who is spirit, treasuring His heart, and longing to live all day every day in His presence, caring because He cares, loving because He loves, living because He has given me life. To someone living spirit obedience, the Bible is not a book of rules, it is the book of God’s heart. It’s there I truly learn who He is, what matters to Him, what pleases Him and what doesn’t – and that’s all I need to know … because I love Him, or rather, because He loves me.

I would suggest the bottom line of what Paul is saying is to get people to realize this is what a real relationship with God is. If someone doesn’t have this spirit relationship with Christ, then all the “religion” in the world will not save them. And how do we gain this relationship? What new religious act is required of us? None at all except simply to believe – to realize that Jesus Himself (and not “religion”) is “the Way and the Truth and the Life,” and that “no one comes to the Father except though Him.”

But then we’re getting ahead of Paul.

What a passage! Once again, I feel like I’m scraping on the bedrock of reality itself. Romans is certainly the book of the unseen – the real truth.

“‘Goodbye,’ said the fox. ‘And now here is my secret, a very simple secret: It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye.’

‘What is essential is invisible to the eye,’ the little prince repeated, so that he would be sure to remember.”

Like the little prince, we should “be sure to remember.”

God help us.

Romans 2:17-24 “Cornered”

As always, here’s my fairly literal translation of these verses:

¹⁷But if you are being called a Jew and resting in law and boasting in God and ¹⁸knowing the desire and examining the differing [things], being instructed out of the Law, ¹⁹and you are persuaded you yourself to be a leader of blind ones, a light to ones in darkness, an instructor of simple ones, a teacher of infants, ²⁰having in the Law the form of the knowledge and the truth, ²¹the one teaching others, are you not teaching yourself?  The one preaching not to be stealing, are you stealing? ²²The one saying not to be committing adultery, are you committing adultery? The one abhorring idols, are you committing sacrilege? ²³Whoever [is] boasting in law is dishonoring God through the transgression of the Law, ²⁴for, just as it is written, “The name of God is being blasphemed because of you (pl.) among the Gentiles.” 

Paul has been developing his argument since at least 1:18, trying to show us that everyone needs the Gospel, that no one will be saved by trying to keep the Law. In chapter 1, he presented the case of the very immoral of this world. To that, any thinking person would easily agree. Certainly if anyone should be judged, it is the very wicked people who do so many “bad” things. In 2:1, Paul turns the argument on anyone who had enough sense of morality to agree with chapter 1. In fact, he proves, the very act of judging others condemns each of us because it proves we know better – leaving us with no excuse for why we ourselves so often have failed and continue to fail.

If anyone was truly one of the “immoral” of chapter 1, read those verses, saw themselves, repented and turned to Christ, that would be a wonderful thing. If anyone read on into chapter 2, saw in themselves the hypocritical moralizer they are, repented and turned to Christ, that too would be a wonderful thing.

But I believe now in 2:17, Paul turns on the most difficult person, the people least likely to ever see their need of a Savior – the very religious lost. Obviously, reading the text, Paul applies his words directly to those who “are called Jews.” What I would ask everyone to see, however, is that today he could have just as easily said, “You who are called Christians…” Paul is talking to people who are very familiar with the Bible, probably people who “grew up in church,” people who attend church regularly, own several Bibles, teach Sunday School, go to Bible studies, sing all the right songs, etc., etc.

Just as in the case of the Jewish people, all of the above is highly commendable. Anyone who “grew up in church” is certainly someone blessed with privileges others did not enjoy. This is true, especially if the church really did teach the Bible, if the message of the Gospel has been clearly presented, if a person can honestly say the stories and teachings of the Bible are very familiar to them. Just as with the Jewish people, it really is true that those are great blessings.

However, the question for each person is, what have you done with all those privileges?  “To whom much is given, much will also be required.” All of those privileges added up do not somehow make us “good.” They only make us more accountable. And, if we would search our hearts, what do we find? Given all this knowledge and opportunity, have I thus been able to pull off a perfect life before God?

The obvious answer should be “No.” Probably even the most religious would admit the answer is “No.” But what does that mean? It means we have sinned against the very bright light of God’s truth! The very immoral were lost even though they perhaps knew nothing of the Bible. The moralizers were lost because their very moralizing proved they had some sense of right and wrong. But here you and I stand, claiming with our own mouths to be people very knowledgeable of God and the things of the Bible. If anyone, we should be the people who in fact are “righteous.”

Yet we are not.

This, I would offer is perhaps the worst form of blindness a human being could suffer – to enjoy the privilege of living in the bright light of Bible truth, and yet to think those privileges somehow equal a righteous standing before God, instead of seeing that all of it utterly robs me of any excuse whatsoever for my sins. It doesn’t make me more righteous. It makes me more guilty!

If anyone ever needed to take hard stock of their life, it’s not the very immoral, it’s the person who knows most the Bible.

In fact, as Paul asserts here in Romans 2, even the very religious have failed to obey the Law, and then it’s even worse than that because, claiming to be religious, their sins (which they do commit) provide opportunities for the enemies of God to blaspheme Him!

This is it. If salvation is to come to those who perfectly keep the Law, then even the very religious are lost. The ones who seem to “try the hardest” are, if anything only more guilty before God!  Salvation does not come to “those who try hardest.” Being very “religious” does not save us. It only makes us more guilty.

We’re cornered.

Sounds to me like we need God to come up with some other way of salvation besides us “doing our best.”

Sounds to me like we need a Savior.

Romans 2:16 “Two-Edged Sword”

As always, here’s my fairly literal translation of these verses:

¹⁶in [the] day when God will judge the secrets of the men according to the Gospel of me through Christ Jesus. 

I feel like, as I study this book of Romans, I am scraping on the bedrock of reality. This is THE TRUTH. The whole world lives chasing here and there, wanting this and that, striving to accomplish so many things, and yet, the overarching reality of our very existence is that there is a God and we will answer to Him for all we do. As Paul will say later in this book, “So then each of us must give an account of himself to God” (14:12). The book of Ecclesiastes put it as, “For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every hidden thing, whether it is good or evil” (12:14). And as Peter says, “But the Day of the Lord will come” (II Peter 3:10).

The Day of the Lord will come.

That is reality – plain, simple reality.

John says in Revelation, “Then I saw a Great White Throne and Him who was seated on it…And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the Throne, and the books were opened…The dead were judged according to what they had done…” (20:11,12).

The Day of the Lord will come.

That is the overarching reality of our very existence.

Just for some exegetical housekeeping, there is a great deal of discussion of how this verse, verse 16, connects with the rest of the context. In Greek, and as I translated it above, it is a continuation of the thinking ahead of it, but, as all seem to agree, the thought itself seems abrupt. The most logically appealing position, based on the grammar, is probably to connect it to verse 12 and consider verses 13-15 as a parenthesis in Paul’s argument. Personally, I would suggest it may simply be, in Paul’s mind, connected to the entire context. This is what he’s been talking about at least since 1:18.

Then there is discussion around the statement, “God will judge the secrets of the men according to the Gospel of me through Christ Jesus.” The question is posed whether God will judge “according to the Gospel” or “through Jesus Christ.” Judging “according to the Gospel” seems logically awkward, since it will be the Gospel which will save people from God’s judgment. I think rather he means us to understand that Jesus Himself will be the Judge, which of course is supported widely through the New Testament in many, many passages.

On the other hand, and for whatever it’s worth, for us believers, the fact that God will judge the world is to us good news. The “Gospel” is God’s good news. First of all, I don’t have to fear it because Jesus already paid for my sins, I am forgiven, and “there is now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus.” Our judgment is now a judgment for reward, not condemnation (I Cor. 3:12-15). What my accountability means to me is that my life matters.  As Paul says later in that same book, “Always give yourselves fully to the work of the Lord, because you know that your labor in the Lord is not in vain” (15:58). It is no fun to be given a work assignment, to work very hard at it, to accomplish the goals, only to have no one ever even check up on it. From a purely human perspective one is tempted to ask, “What’s the difference? No one seems to care anyway.” Knowing the Lord and that the Day of the Lord will come, I can say, “I did it for Him and He cares!” If I am accountable to Him then everything matters!

What I particularly want to comment on, however, from this verse in Romans, is that fact that Jesus Himself will be the Judge. That simple fact becomes what I would suggest is the colossal two-edged sword of reality.

Think about it. What difference does it make for us believers that Jesus is the Judge? Who is He? He’s our Savior! The same Jesus who will be seated on the Throne, who will be looking at you on that Day, was also looking at you as He hung on that Cross and died. He knew you then and He knows you now. He knew all about your sins then and He still knows about them now, yet “in His great love wherewith He loved us” He Himself chose to remove our transgressions from us, “as far as the east is from the west.” Our Jesus who “judges” us, is the very One who already loved us and saved us “to the uttermost.” What enormous comfort we ought to take knowing that He is who is my Savior is the Judge!

On the other hand, and this is the awful two-edged sword of reality, what difference will it make for those who spurned that love and spit in His face, who said of Jesus, “We will not have this Man to rule over us!” Suddenly, there they will be standing face to face with this One who went to the Cross for them, who loved them with that same “everlasting love,” who all their life provided food to eat and the sun to shine, who gave them every possible opportunity to be saved, who even “appointed the times of their lives and the place where they would live, if perhaps they might feel after Him and find Him” (Acts 17:27).

To add to their horror, they will find out this Judge knows about every act of cruelty, especially the times they mocked, and ridiculed, and persecuted His people, His children. He knows every secret of their naturally lying, murderous hearts, that, in life, they were like their father the devil and the lusts of their father they did. What a horror it will be to stand before this One without His precious blood to cover their sins. Someone once remarked that the Lord probably will not need to send anyone to hell – they’ll probably run and jump in just to escape those awful flaming eyes!

The Day of the Lord is reality.

And that reality is a two-edged sword. It will be a day of reward for His people and a horrible day of exposure and condemnation for those who never knew Him.

Every human being needs to stop their moving, stop chasing, stop their lying, murderous thoughts and come face to face with this reality: the Day of the Lord will come. To embrace Him now is to be saved forever, to be able to look forward hopefully to that Day of Judgment. To spurn Him now does not mean they’ll escape from that Day. To stand before Him is an appointment we all will keep.

Choose well.

Romans 2:14,15 “In Need of Repair”

As always, here’s my fairly literal translation of these verses:

¹⁴for, when Gentiles, not having the Law do by nature the things of the Law, these, not having law are a law to themselves, ¹⁵these are showing the work of the Law written in the hearts of them, the conscience of them defending and the thoughts accusing and/or defending between each other. 

As I have been studying these two verses, I have noted quite a few of what I would consider to be significant exegetical issues. I want to record them, if for no other reason, so I’ll be reminded of them if I should ever be back in this book.

Not necessarily in any order, I find it interesting that suddenly the word “law” becomes articular where it has been up to this point anarthrous. You can see in my translation above where I have tried to reflect these differences. Where the Greek is articular (includes the word “the”), I have taken the liberty to translate it as “the Law.” I am presuming that is the point – to distinguish between “the Law” and “law” in the general sense. The Gentiles don’t have “the Law,” but they still have “law.”

Then in verse 14, there is a grammatical peculiarity where I have translated it as “when Gentiles, not having the Law…” What is strange is that the Greek article is here a neuter plural, while the word for law is masculine singular. It doesn’t seem correct to jam them together and translate it as “the Law,” but I am clueless what else to do with it. In the references I have consulted, no one else seems to even notice the peculiarity and apparently across the board everyone translates it as “the Law.” It bothers me that translation isn’t addressing the difference in gender.

There is a question amongst expositors whether the “by nature” should be attached as “not having the Law do by nature the things of the Law” or “not having the Law by nature.” In this case, I acknowledge there is some ambiguity given the position of the dative word we’re translating “by nature.” However, I think the former makes more sense in the logic of the section, and then again, I’m not so sure it makes a lot of difference. But it is there and it is debatable which way to go.

There are a couple of other exegetical matters but I think I’ll identify them as I discuss their portions of the verses.

Basically, what I am seeing is that we are still on the main subject of God’s judgment and Paul is on his way to proving that “all have sinned and come short…” (3:23). I believe the traditional understanding is correct, that Paul is basically addressing the question of whether the Gentiles are accountable since obviously they didn’t have “the Law.” This whole discussion started with 1:18,19: “The wrath of God is being revealed against all the godlessness and wickedness of men…since what may be known about God is plain to them…” He there stated the principle of universal guilt but now is specifically addressing this question of whether people without “the Law” are off the hook. Is ignorance an excuse?

The very clear and emphatic answer is “No.” The fact is they all have a conscience, a sense of right and wrong. Even without “the Law,” they are aware there is law and the implication is they don’t even live up to that. That’s the big point, I think.

Others have written extensively on these verses, but what I’d like to comment on is this subject of “conscience.” I’ve never really looked at it specifically in the Bible, but having worked through a number of references and thinking about it, I believe it is a part of our original creation. God created us to be moral beings. He created us with the power of choice. In a perfect world, wouldn’t it be wonderful to have a conscience that worked perfectly, that always guided us to the right thing to do?

I personally do not doubt that, in eternity, that is exactly what the Lord will restore in us. I’ve thought for a long time, what it will be like to be what we call “confirmed in holiness” – by which we mean when the Lord will make us so we don’t sin anymore, so that we always do the right thing. What I could never quite reconcile in my mind was the fact that the freedom to choose is part of the fabric of our being. What if we will continue to be people who choose, but then we will have that perfect conscience that always guides us to do the right thing? It’s already true that I choose to be confirmed in holiness. I want the Lord to take away my sin nature. I want to be a person who always does the right thing. For Him to give me a perfect conscience would be something I will welcome with open arms.

I believe the problem for us today is that our conscience was corrupted by the Fall just like everything else about us. Although it is there and still functional, it is a broken machine. We know our conscience can be seared so that in certain ways, it doesn’t work at all. It can also be misguided to where we actually call good evil and evil good. That is part of the place of the Bible for us believers – that its truth can expose and correct our misunderstandings of what is and is not right.

People say, “Let your conscience be your guide,” but in this world I think we all know that is not always good advice. I need to let the Bible be my guide. If my “conscience” is asserting an understanding of right and wrong contrary to the Bible, I need to do what the Bible says. When Peter was having the vision in Acts 10, the heavenly voice said, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.” Peter’s response (based on his conscience) was, “Surely not, Lord!” And what was the answer? “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.” You see, Peter’s “conscience” needed some re-training.

Once again, that is one of the benefits of reading and studying our Bibles. Our broken consciences have been filled with all kinds of standards and “rights and wrongs” that have no support at all in the Bible. Each one needs to be exposed and replaced with truth. I feel like my whole adult life, the Bible has been doing exactly that. One “truth” after another has been challenged and I’ve had to re-align my understanding of what God actually thinks is right and wrong.

Of course, God’s “rights and wrongs” are wonderfully liberating. Jesus said, “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free,” and I always find that to be the case. My “rights and wrongs” always incur some kind of slavery, some kind of hardness in my heart. God’s “rights and wrongs” always come with a freedom I’ve never known before, a real heart freedom, a freedom to love I didn’t know before.

It’s interesting to note in verse 15 the words I translated “between each other.” I think the most immediately obvious understanding is he’s talking about our thoughts which we all are very aware do exactly what he’s saying – “excusing and condemning” – at the same time. It has also been suggested the “between each other” is the idea that, even among the “lawless” Gentiles, they constantly judge each other’s behavior as well. How evident is that today? The politicians play this game incessantly. Even the godless liberals jump up and condemn as “wrong” anything they don’t like, and then of course defend their own people who do exactly the same and worse. Perhaps that is the “between each other,” some expositors suggest.

Interesting that people who deny that there even is truth or any standard of right and wrong, are very quick to call things “wrong” when they don’t like them. As much as they may want to live in a world without God, they do exactly what it is saying in Romans 2:15 – display the “work of the Law” written in their hearts. Their consciences are enormously corrupted, so that they really do call good evil and evil good, and as it said at the end of chapter 1, they not only do evil, but applaud anyone else who does it too – but they daily display that in fact they do have a conscience, corrupted as it may be.

And so, in even the worst case, it’s evident that Paul is right. They do have a sense of right and wrong. And again, if they ever got honest, they’d have to admit, they haven’t lived up to even their own (perverted) standards.

Ignorance is no excuse. Our good God has given everyone every possible chance, every possible warning.

May we be thankful for our conscience. Realizing its work, may we be all the more determined to know our Bibles and let the Lord “fix” that conscience here on earth until finally that day when “This robe of flesh I’ll drop and rise to gain the everlasting prize!”

Romans 2:13 “Deluded Hearers”

As always, here’s my fairly literal translation of these verses:

¹³for [it is] not the ones hearing of law [who are] righteous ones before God, but the doers of law will be declared righteous. 

This passage reminds us of the danger of being “hearers of the Word” and not “doers.” It is apparently a huge temptation for human beings to be “satisfied” that they have heard the Word, that they “know” the Word, that they personally own several copies of the Word, that they sing about it, talk about it, revere it  -- all without ever pausing to ask the question, “Yes, but do I do it?”

Before we get too far with these thoughts, we need to remember where we are in the Bible. We are in Romans 2. We are in a passage where the Lord wants every human being to see that without Christ they are lost and hopeless. If all we read was just this one verse, we might think we really can be “doers of the Word” and thus declared righteous. In this larger context of Romans 1-3, that would be an absurd conclusion, “for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified in the sight of God.” No, in these verses the Lord is trying to shatter the delusions of the moral and religious lost. He must first destroy this idea that because they “know” the Word, they’re on their way to heaven.

As you and I would ponder our eternal destiny, He wants us to forget the “hearing” part and focus on the “doing.” Am I a “doer?” If, for even a second, I would pause to ponder that question, what must be my answer? No. In the same moment I consider it’s not enough to be a hearer, I also am convicted I am not a doer. Not only that, but in my heart of hearts, I know I never will be. If the standard of earning heaven – being declared righteous – is to be a successful doer, then I am lost and I know it.

Precisely where the Lord wants you and me to be. That is Paul’s point. That is where Romans 1-3 is trying to carry the human race. Strip away all the delusions and the plain simple fact is that I do not and cannot carry out God’s Law. I need a Savior. Ah, yes. Later on he will tell us, “But now, a righteousness of God apart from the Law has been declared…” As we would read this one verse in chapter 2, we need to remember its context and the message of the rest of the Bible – the Law only is and only ever was a “schoolmaster” to bring us to Christ.

But first, God has to expose our delusion that somehow being hearers of the Word can save us.

There are two major passages in the Bible that address this problem head on:

Matthew 7:24-27: “Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock.  The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock.  But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash.”

James 1:22-25: “Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says. Anyone who listens to the word but does not do what it says is like someone who looks at his face in a mirror and, after looking at himself, goes away and immediately forgets what he looks like. But whoever looks intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, and continues in it—not forgetting what they have heard, but doing it—they will be blessed in what they do.”

In my mind, this problem of hearers/doers is, in Romans 2, primarily a problem for unbelievers. As discussed above, it is a problem that keeps them deluded and lulled to sleep spiritually. Basically the Law cannot convict them of sin if, having heard it, they are quite sure they no longer need to give it any thought. Hopefully, for some, if even for a minute, they would let the Holy Spirit challenge their “doing,” they would immediately realize they fall short.

Of course, the challenges in Matthew and James are addressed to believers. Even having been born again, apparently our flesh would still use the same old ruse to lull us to sleep and keep us from growing and being fruitful for the Lord. I would guess in our case, just to stop and ponder it for a second is convicting because we are all too aware we fall short. The very root of our faith is the realization we need a Savior and thankfully have found Him! I don’t think this is something we need to “beat ourselves up” over, but rather a call to prayer and humility before God. “Lord, search me and know my heart…and see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the Way everlasting!” If the Lord shows us something we need to change we need to prayerfully get after it. If nothing particularly comes to mind, we can stay confident in the ocean of His love.