Here’s my fairly literal translation of these verses:
36And the king will do according
to his will and he will exalt himself and he will magnify himself above every
god and upon the God of gods. He will speak things being amazing and he will
succeed until the fury is accomplished according to what is decreed shall be
accomplished. 37And he will not regard upon the gods of his
forefathers, nor upon the desire of women, nor will he regard upon any god
because he will magnify himself upon all. 38And a god of fortresses
he will honor upon his place, and he will honor a god which his forefathers
have not known, in gold and in silver and in precious stone and in desirable
things. 39And he will do to fortresses of fortresses with a foreign
god which he will regard. He will increase glory and he will make them rule in
many and [he/they will] divide the land in a price.
As I said at the start of my last
post, at this point, commentators differ over whether the angel is still
talking about Antiochus Epiphanes or if he has morphed ahead to anticipate the
Antichrist himself. After studying almost all the way through the book of Daniel,
along with all the other reading and studying of the various prophetical
sections of the Bible, I would like to record a number of thoughts I have on
the subject.
After all these years, I have
come to two observations regarding prophecy. First of all, I am amazed how all
the prophecy of the Bible fits together. If we just let it say what it says, we
believers have a very thorough outline for the course of human history right
into eternity. I feel I have not sufficiently appreciated what a blessing that
is. We may not know all the particulars, but we can literally watch history
unfold before our eyes and say, “Yup. That’s exactly what the Lord said would
happen.”
At the same time, the other thing
that amazes me is how cryptic most prophecy is. The passage in front of us is “case
in point.” Read it again and ask yourself, “What on earth does this mean?” It
seems to me,very often, the overall thrust
and meaning of a prophecy can be clear enough, while particular words and phrases
are simply baffling. As Jesus said, “I have told you now before it happens, so
that when it does happen, you will believe…I have told you this, so that when
the time comes you will remember that I warned you” (John 14:29; 16:4). “When it
does happen…” Prophecy is just cryptic enough that we all should hold our interpretations
“with an open hand,” waiting for their fulfillment to reveal for sure what they
meant.
Then, I suppose that should have
at least two impacts on us. One is to keep us humble. When someone has a
different interpretation, I should be “quick to listen and slow to speak.” I
need to constantly remind myself that what is “true” is not necessarily my
interpretation of prophecy, but rather the Bible itself. In fact, as those “cryptic”
passages unfold before our eyes, I need to be quite ready to shuck my
preconceived notions and believe what the Lord Himself reveals. I can only say,
“God, help me to hang on tightly not to my interpretations, but rather to Your
words, whether they make sense or not.”
The second impact should be to
drive us to personal study. I need to know His words. Though we may not
know what Daniel 11:36-39 means, still we are greatly profited just to know it.
As I read books and listen to sermons, I want to know when what they’re saying
is true to Scripture. The “test” is not my interpretation, but rather the
Scriptures themselves. That is only possible if I actually know the
Scriptures – and that can come only from my own personal study and/or reading.
It may sound cliché, but we believers need to “know our Bibles” – including prophetical
sections that may not appear today to make any sense at all.
Another thought that bears on
this passage is this business of the morphing. As I said, at this point, many
commentators differ whether this is still about Antiochus or if it has morphed
into the Antichrist. I’ve addressed this before, but most exegetes call this
sort of thing “types.” They might admit that it is hard to tell whether it is
the former or the latter, but they explain the first was a “type” of the last.
That is all well and good, but I personally think it’s missing an enormous
reality of the Lord’s entire created universe.
This entire Creation is fractal.
A fractal is a pattern that repeats itself a million different times, in a
million different ways, and on a million different scales. If we have the eyes
to see, everywhere we look, we see fractals. When Adam fell, he set about a
pattern – his image – which would thereafter define the human race. We all
naturally act like Adam. The prayer from the old hymn was “Adam’s image now
efface; Stamp Thine image in its place.” One of the Lord’s purposes in saving
us is “that we might be conformed to the image of His Son.” Our lives
either follow the fractal (pattern) of Adam’s rebellion or that of God’s Son Jesus.
The longer I live, the more clearly I realize how all true believers are Jesus
people. They may express that in a million different ways, but there’s no
mistaking a person who is clearly “like” Jesus.
I could go on and on. Trees are
trees. A whole forest is full of trees. We look at each one and say, “That’s a
tree.” They are all following a pattern which we recognize as a “tree.” Yet, no
two trees are exactly alike, even though they follow that same pattern. Then there
are different kinds of trees – oak trees, maple trees, sycamore trees. Although
they are all trees, yet there is a different pattern that defines which kind of
tree they are. We can go further and notice there are different kinds of oaks –
white oaks, and red oaks, and black oaks – still following patterns of their
own – yet still all “oaks” and all “trees.” We could even talk about a family “tree.”
We call it a tree because it follows that same pattern.
The very logic of life itself is
fractal. We exist as and in a world of endlessly repeating patterns. Those are
fractals. To say one thing is a “type” of another is to recognize a repeated
pattern, but it limits that pattern to those two seemingly similar things. It
misses the fact that the fractal is much, much bigger than just one thing being
a “type” of another.
When we observe Antiochus and
then see so much similarity in who he is and what he does, we shouldn’t be
considering whether he is a “type” of the Antichrist; we should be recognizing
a fractal. Stop a minute and ask yourself, what is that fractal? What is the
pattern they both follow? “The king will do as he pleases. He will exalt and
magnify himself above every god and will say unheard of things against the God of
gods” (v.36). Who does that remind you of? “I will raise my throne above the
stars of God; I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will make myself
like the Most High…” (Isa. 14:13,14).
Both Antiochus and the Antichrist
are Satan’s men. They are like their father, the devil. They’re
not similar because one is some sort of “type” of the other. They’re similar
because they’re both like their father! Then step back and realize that
pattern isn’t limited to those two men. It is Satan’s pattern – the pattern of
total rebellion against God. They are both examples of what men (and women)
become when, like the devil, they purposefully and willfully spit in God’s
face.
One of the things that leads me
to believe the text has, in fact, morphed ahead to the Antichrist is how commentators
struggle, from v.36 to the end of the chapter, trying to say Antiochus fits
this description. The fact is he does, but then he doesn’t. Much about him is
similar, yet it takes some hermeneutical gymnastics to squeeze him into this mold.
Like two oak trees, though they are both oaks and are very similar, and though
they follow forever the same distinct fractal pattern, yet they are not
the same.
In II Thes. 2:3,4, Paul says, “Do
not let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the
rebellion occurs and man of lawlessness is revealed…He will oppose and will
exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he
sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.”
Sound familiar? It should. Anyone
who has studied Daniel would say immediately, “It’s the little horn! – the one
with “the eyes of a man and a mouth that spoke boastfully” (7:8). Paul is
speaking some two hundred years after Antiochus died and yet speaks of the
future. When Jesus spoke of the “Abomination of Desolation,” He specifically referenced
the one foretold by Daniel (Matt. 24:15), and, at that time, it was yet future.
Even John’s prophecies of Revelation were yet future. All was long after
Antiochus was dead. Interestingly, commentators observe that much about the
Romans and their destruction of the temple fits “the pattern” of these verses,
yet, again, it takes a lot of hermeneutical wiggling to “make them fit.”
Later expositors tried hard to
make these passages refer to the Catholic Church and the popes, and to this day,
people find them fulfilled in Adolf Hitler and even Barack Obama! How can this
be? It is because all these people or situations may fit the pattern in some
way or another, yet not quite. As in Paul’s day, though “the spirit of
Antichrist” may abound around us, yet, as far as we know, his coming is yet
future. One thing you can be assured – when he finally is revealed, if we’re
still around and if we know our Bibles, it will be obvious “he’s the man.”
As far as I’m concerned, all of
this explains the constant struggle of commentators to see in these passages
all sorts of different historical figures who “fit” the pattern, yet don’t. The
reason why is because they are all part of the same fractal, the same infinite
pattern. Yet, may we all be reminded what pattern it is – the pattern of the
father of lies, the devil. It is Satan’s image which permeates this world, with
all it’s lies and murder and stealing and rebellion against God. And who is the
Antichrist? He is the ultimate, totally unrestrained version of a human being
completely yielded to the image of his father, the devil.
I believe it explains much about
prophecy to understand fractals and to see that their patterns define the world
around us. In fact, if we have the eyes to see, fractals greatly define us.
Anyone who knows my family will immediately note that I look like my father and
my son looks like me. Much is the same, but, then again, we are not the same. I
am me and they are them. Human history proceeds pretty much as it always has. “People
eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage.” Buying and selling,
fighting and killing, civilizations rising and falling. It’s all fractals.
If I could end with a practical
observation, one of the biggest questions this leaves with each of us is simply
this: Who’s image do you want to bear? In this one case, it is your choice – and there are only two. You’ll either bear the
image of Jesus or you will bear the image of Satan. This is a fractal world.
Most of the fractals you cannot control, but this one you can. Unfortunately,
we were born in the default position – Adam’s image, which is ultimately Satan’s.
To think we do not have to make a choice is to have already chosen. Romans 10:9
echoes down through the centuries, “That if you will acknowledge Jesus is Lord,
and believe in your heart God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.” “Whosoever
will may come.” Having made that choice, each of us will find that “the fruit
of the Spirit is love and joy and peace,” a world where the Lord Himself has
promised us “a future and a hope.” To
refuse the choice is to already have chosen to live in Satan’s fractal – a world
of broken relationships and endless frustration and confusion, a world of
constantly dashed hopes, a world of “ever learning, yet never coming to a
knowledge of the truth.”
Prophecies are fractal. Our world
is fractal. Our lives are fractal. In one case alone, we choose the fractal we’ll
live (and die) in. It’s either Jesus or the devil. No other choices.
What have you chosen?